By Sonia A. Hall
Now that spring is here and the cherry trees are starting to bloom, take a few minutes to check out John Abatzoglou’s article in the latest Climate CIRCulator’s Northwest Climate Currents. By relating the conditions the Northwest experienced this past February and March (and the earlier mild times we had in December and January), Dr. Abatzoglou puts our winter in context. He also explains the weather patterns that were responsible for the low temperatures and widespread low-elevation snow we saw, and why they occurred. He then goes on to discuss the broader context of how to reconcile these experiences with our understanding of how the climate is changing. Because I find this particularly fascinating, and feel it is important to hear what the experts say about it, I repost that portion of Dr. Abatzoglou’s article below, with some revisions he kindly made so that it does not feel like an excerpt (thank you, John). Read on to get a better handle on this apparent contradiction.
Excerpt, with modifications, from Dr. Abatzoglou’s article (read the entire article on the Climate CIRCulator website).
Does this recent cold snap have anything to do with climate change? Before we point any fingers, let’s break this question down into bite-size pieces.
The cold end to winter requires historical context. Climatological winter (December to February) ended up being a bit of a wash after the warm start to winter combined with the bitter temperatures of February. This winter’s temperatures were -0.9°F below average temperatures during 1981 to 2010, but middle of the pack when compared to the past 124 winters (58th coldest, or 67th warmest if you prefer). Winter temperatures have warmed in the Northwest by approximately 3°F since 1895 (Figure 1). (Yes, human-caused climate change is the predominant source for this long-term rise.)
Winter temperatures in the Northwest are variable. This is quite apparent in Figure 1. This is due to the strong jet stream and mid-latitude waves in winter. Some climate researchers now suspect that cold air outbreaks in the mid-latitudes will paradoxically increase with a warming planet. This increase in cold due to warming is itself due to a weakening of the jet stream as the Arctic warms much faster than the lower latitudes in winter. A weakened polar jet stream, it has been argued, allows for more “loopy” atmospheric patterns that could displace cold arctic air masses from the north to the south. This is precisely what we saw in February and what parts of Western Europe and the eastern US have been privy to in recent winters. However, we should note that the research is still being evaluated and is not something that climate models agree upon.
Sure it was cold in the Northwest and other portions of the US and Canada, and it was bitterly cold in the American West in February, but globally not so much. Much of the United Kingdom basked in exceptionally warm temperatures in February, while Australia had its warmest December to February on record—besting the previous warmest summer by a whopping 1.5°F. So the globe as a whole certainly was not experiencing the same level as cold as we were this winter (Figure 2).
What is clear is that our planet’s northern climes are seeing a marked reduction in the extent of extremely cold air masses in winter. Because the Arctic is the origin, or source region, of the cold air outbreaks that we experience in the Northwest, the disproportional rate of winter warming in the Arctic and high-latitude landmasses across Canada over the past century means that our cold air outbreaks should be warmer than they used to be. Indeed, the coldest daily temperatures of the year have warmed far-greater than average winter temperatures across the region.
While there has been less research done on changes in observed or future snowfall extremes relative to temperature, there is reason to believe that changes in snowfall extremes could be more nuanced. On the one hand, warming leads to higher snow levels and less precipitation falling as snow. On the other hand, precipitation intensity is modeled to increase in general terms. This means that snowfall extremes may increase in areas that are sufficiently cold today and that will remain cold enough (and be above the future rising snow line) to capitalize on increased precipitation rates. For instance, one study found that extreme snowfall events are likely to increase in magnitude relative to other snowfall events by the mid 21st century across the western US mountains. Another study found that daily temperatures warm the least during heavy precipitation events under future climate scenarios.
While much about extreme snowfall remains up in the air (pun intended), climate change has and will continue to load the dice for certain types of winters. Bet on fewer winters with healthy seasonal snowfall totals in mid-to-lower elevation mountains in the coming decades. Cold months will continue to be more and more scarce—but not necessarily disappear entirely—with continued warming.
So, while climate change did not cause the frigid late winter temperatures this year, climate change likely made this winter less cold than it would have been. That may be of little consolation given the weeks of teeth chattering in February and early March. But in the long run, this might lead the region to welcome instead of fear the occasional snowpocalypse.
This excerpt is modified from a post that is part of Northwest Climate Currents, an ongoing Climate CIRCulator series that uses the Northwest Climate Toolbox and the data it collects to help Northwest residents understand and prepare for the region’s climate events. The Toolbox is a suite of free online applications designed by CIRC researchers and intended to help foresters, farmers, and water managers respond to and prepare for climate variability and change and related impacts.
Acknowledgements: The Northwest Climate Toolbox is funded in part through the NOAA Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) program and National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS).
Comments